Fuck PETA

16 02 2009

First this (watch for 12 seconds at your own peril).

And then this.

Because there's nothing more sexaayy than dead women sprawled nude on the floor. ::snark::

I’m gonna first start with the nitty gritty on what exactly is so disturbing and obnoxious about PETA’s racist demonstration and sexist ads. Then I’ll make some comparisons between the media coverage of the racist demonstration and the sexist TV ad.

PETA held its KKK demonstration at Madison Square, in New York. New York is in the U.S. of A. The U.S. of A. was built on the backs of Black slaves, Native American indentured servants, the oppression of non-white groups in general, and sex-classed women (many of whom are also members of said racial groups) for centuries. And the Ku Klux Klan was founded in the U.S. of A. About 140 years ago, in Tennessee, to be precise. And for almost a century and a half in this great nation, KKK fuckers have been terrorizing folks of color, intimidating them from exercising their right to vote, burning crosses on Black folks’ yards, gang-raping women and men of color, and basically being one of the worst terrorist groups in American history. I guess PETA either wanted to be added to the list of America’s most awful terrorist groups (I think they should), or they didn’t think, in their privileged college-educated phallocentric minds, that perhaps the mere sight of white people initially perceived to be members of the KKK (with white hoods, robes, and all) could be disturbing, nay, traumatizing, to folks of color walking along Madison Square.

But what really gets me even more about the mock KKK demonstration by PETA is the fact that they are trying to draw an analogy between the Westminster Kennel Club’s promotion of pure-breeding dogs and the KKK’s advocation of a (White) master race. This trivializes not only the suffering of folks of color at the hands of a White Supremacist organization, it reveals PETA’s complete misunderstanding (or lack of effort/care to understand) the reasons that groups like the KKK would have for wanting to kill off non-white folks. The Kennel Club’s promotion of pure-breeding leads to health problems for various dogs. Promoting White Supremacy and a master race (as the KKK does) does not hurt the white folks who only want to screw each other and make more white babies. It hurts the non-white folks in that the very notion of a “pure” White race only exists because there is the concept of a “non-White/non-pure” sub-class or race. It’s not like the Westminster Kennel Club is going around terrorizing and raping mutts and mixed dogs, for fuck’s sake. The fact that I am even having to write out the reasons that PETA’s demonstration is racially insensitive, White-centric, and ridiculous is making me realize more and more how absurd this PETA demonstration is.

And I’m not done there. Drawing a parallel between the pure-breeding of dogs (with its harmful side-effects) and the mass oppression/rape/terrorization of non-White folks is such a huge slap in the face to folks of color. Let’s keep in mind that vegetarian, vegan, and animal rights movements are traditionally and often White and middle-upper class. Rich white folks have the time and money to buy their expensive organic produce and go home and cook their Ina Garten-inspired recipes with said produce. Many folks of color in America, specifically Black and Hispanic folks, do not have the time or resources to do so. Thus, meat, dairy, and animal by-products (many of which are included in processed, low-quality foods) are a big part of their diets. To many folks of color the suggestion that one should restrict their already-dwindling choices of foods to feed their families would be absurd. The suggestion that they should refuse to eat meat, that a cow or pig has the same rights they do (when they barely have any rights or human status to start with) is ludicrous and blatantly offensive. My folks are Egyptian. My grandmother would tell me stories of seeing kids and adults having to beg, in huge numbers, on the streets of Cairo to barely feed themselves every day. Being able to restrict your diet so much, based on moral (non-religious) grounds, is indeed a class and race privilege, people.

So just imagine the double affront that folks of color had to deal with when they happened upon those PETA/mock-KKK demonstrators at Madison Square: not only was their systematic oppression, represented by one extremist/terrorist group, being trivialized, they were being told (perhaps unintentionally) that their very few rights as human beings of color are not merely as important as those of some pure-bred dogs at the Westminster Kennel Club.

Disgusting.

Regarding the absent-mindedly racist demonstration by PETA:

Most passers-by seemed more puzzled than offended, though those who didn’t stop walked away thinking they really had seen the KKK. The most common reaction was to pull out a cell phone and start snapping photos.

Police monitored the situation from nearby, but the scene was mostly calm. One shouting match broke out during the hour-long protest.

Earlier, a man strode away yelling, “That’s disgusting! I’m going to buy more fur!”

Good job, PETA. Your members, on one hand, look down on the masses by assuming that they’re too stupid and base to understand how animals should have rights like humans do by making adverts and demonstrations that cater to preconceived notions about race, gender, and class. Ads and protests that use the showiest and most obnoxious tactics to get people’s attention and shock them. And what has PETA accomplished? It’s hard to say, because they create adverts and demonstrations that don’t even get their point across at all to passersby and viewers. All PETA does is offend for the sake of offending, in order to get press time and media attention.

Speaking of whiny little white male hipster brats trying their very hardest to get attention, let’s turn to the (yet again) porntastic travails of PETA and its marketing crew.

What’s interesting here is that PETA doesn’t have to necessarily make such an openly political (I’m being nice here in referring to the above-mentioned demonstration as “political”) point about “master race” or oppression. It’s simply catering to the pornified representations of women that completely flood Superbowl TV and advertising. In fact, they don’t even have to get that creative. The advert crew at PETA’s headquarters sat there and thought “We need naked women, but this time, doing the naughty with vegetables! And then if men realize they can get their girlfriends/wives to shove olive-oiled asparagus and broccoli up their vajayjays that’ll make vegetables cool! And then women will empowerfulmentalize themselves by not eating meat AND showing vegetables some porntastic love!” I am almost certain that’s how it went. Why in the hell would any regular old Joe watching the Superbowl give two shits about not eating meat, let alone animal rights? What kind of demographic is PETA trying to target with this tacky, repulsive, misogynist ad? And what are female viewers really supposed to make of this? Were the folks at PETA hoping, perhaps, that the male viewer might identify with the carrot sitting in a woman’s cleavage and think “Gee, I would love to be that vegetable…vegetables get lots of sex with women….I’ll never eat meat again!” On second thought, eating the vegetables would severely minimize their chances of being shoved up women’s orifices and rubbed against their breasts, so are the folks at PETA confused? Perchance?

While the intentions of PETA’s personifying pumpkins is unclear, the tagline of the commercial is “Vegetarians have better sex.” Yup, that’s what folks at PETA are truly concerned about. People have boring sex. In fact, one idiot from PETA just shows the organization’s true colors:

Says a PETA rep: “PETA’s veggie ads are locked out, while ads for fried chicken and burgers are allowed, even though these foods make Americans fat, sick and boring in bed.”

Translation: “Animal rights? Pfsh, who cares?! We just don’t want you fugly bitches gaining weight and not putting out for us men in the bedroom! Who wants to fuck a fat woman with a cold?”

There is, again for the millionth time, the direct connection drawn between women’s naked (or half-naked) bodies and penetrative/hetero sex. And semen-receptacle is precisely the sole function that women carry, according to Patriarchy (and to it’s sidekick, PETA, of course).

Some people (not enough people, frankly) are outraged at the racist imagery put forth by the NY PETA demonstration on account it could traumatize people of color who have to have it shoved in their faces. And, as detailed near the beginning of this post, I agree. PETA is a white and male-privileged organization that can’t even differentiate its head from its ass when it comes to knowing how to use allusions to racism and genocide (of animals) without acting like the self-righteous white morons they are.

But, alas. What is it about the “racy” sexist PETA ad that got it pulled from playing during the Super Bowl? Because it was too “sexual.” NOT because it contributes to the dehumanization of women. NOT because it perpetuates the idea that women are, indeed, a sex class. No. It got pulled because people wouldn’t want 5-year-old Johnny to see a half-naked white woman grind her vag on a squash. Little Johnny’s not quite old enough yet to be taught to see women as fucking-machines, so says society,

But then again, I’m not surprised at this double standard in media coverage. Hell, sports culture all over the world, and especially in the U.S., completely thrives and relies on hyper-masculinity and misogyny. And while PETA and all of its supporters may fold their arms in smug hipster satisfaction that they’ve provoked the masses into questioning their meat-eating ways, they definitely have no problem in taking part in mainstream misogyny. The Superbowl ad time slots, and a regular day at Madison Square, were a perfect opportunity for a thoughtful and creative organization such as PETA :/

Just to drive the point home.

Perhaps we should all write up a petition urging PETA to quit its racist and misogynist ways. It will say “Black men and women are animals too!” It might actually get them to start giving a rat’s ass about the rights, dignity, and well-being of women (of all races) and men of color. :/





International Women of Color Strike Back in London!

5 02 2009

For those of you feminists/women’s liberationists and any other women in London who care about the rights and livelihood of women of color:

Global Women Strike Event.

Thanks to Black Looks for letting us know about this event.

Please let me know if you go and how it goes/went. I am only sorry I don’t live in England.





Best of Craigslist Men 4 Women Personals!

30 01 2009

In the city of Houston, of course. I don’t have THAT much time to troll around all the damned cities and countries on Craigslist, sheesh.
Alright, so this is the first ever Best of Houston Craigslist Men 4 Women Personals post. Woohoo! These personals range anywhere from harmlessly stupid, to obliviously entitled, to downright scary. Every couple of days I’ll be posting a link to a m4w CL ad that catches my attention for some reason or another.
Here it is! The Young Millionaire….

Potential domestic violence situation? Yep. He’s going to “take care of your financial and emotional needs…” Isn’t that something pimps do? Yep.
I’ll let you all rip away at the rest.





Racist DJ in Arizona Makes Rape Jokes

27 07 2008

Did I mention I spent a great deal of my upper-middle class sandnigger childhood in Arizona? Let me just give you an idea of what white males are like there. Here is the story, courtesy of WOC PhD (thanks Prof ;) ):

http://profbw.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/another-public-figure-thinks-rape-jokes-are-funny/

Hi, my name is Jon Justice and I am a sexist racist clusterfuck

Hi, my name is Jon Justice and I am a sexist racist clusterfuck

Oh, I forgot, most white males are basically like this, on a continuum. Also note that violence against women of color, specifically Latina women near the U.S./Mexico border, is rampant. Coyotes, white vigilantes, and police officers frequently rape, torture, and abuse Mexican and Central American women trying to cross the border.

http://www.change-links.org/Violence.html

http://www.libertadlatina.org/Crisis_Lat_Mexico_Juarez_Femicide.htm

Haha, so fuckin funny :/





Who Would Have Thought?

22 07 2008

That I would care about the presidential election so much?  What with gender and race and so many other factors that have explicitely colored the coverage and progress of the presidential campaign, I guess I have some really strong feelings about what’s going on in Washington D.C. lately.

This article, by Melissa McEwan (via MaryTracy ;) ), is one of the best articles I have ever read about the important decisions being made, and the fine lines being walked, by feminists and womanists all over the U.S. in regards to this presidential election.

It’s really tough being a woman, particularly a woman of color, and trying to wrap my head around the sexism and racism being made even more apparent because of this election. I just got my citizenship about 2 or so years ago, and I have been so jaded with the government and electoral system in this country that I haven’t bothered to vote. This particular quote from McEwan’s essay really struck me:

Shaker CE once said in comments, “Knowing that the alternative is worse actually makes it harder for me; it just reinforces that sense I often get from some Dems, including Sen. Obama in this cycle, that they think they can do whatever the fuck they like to me, because I don’t have any other option. The worst part? They’re right.”

They are right. And I am not sure I am going to vote this election either. That’s the most disturbing thing about this election: the decisions that many of us feminists have to make are extremely difficult and complex. And I am tired of being threatened, cajoled, and manipulated by self-proclaimed “liberals” into supporting a presidential candidate (i.e. Obama) that has benefitted passively and actively from sexism and misogyny.

This sandnigger bitch is not takin’ that white liberal male bullshit anymore. Thanks.

Just go read the McEwan essay! Go, go, go!





AOL: Assholes Online

20 07 2008
Miley is being hyerpsexualized as an adolescent girl...so it must be her fault!  That tart!

Patriarchy says: Miley is being hyerpsexualized as an adolescent girl...so it must be her fault! That tart!

I am studying my GREs (the GRE is a standardized test required for college students trying to get into graduate schools here in the U.S.) and I am working on the section that deals with analytical writing. One of the essay/issue prompts that my GRE practice book provides for practice is this:

During times of war and a struggling economy, obsession with celebrity becomes stronger in the media so that the public can distract itself from the stresses that war and a bad economy bring.

That’s just a basic paraphrasing of what the essay prompt said in my practice book. But it’s extremely relevant and timely, this one. And it is no coincidence that as the U.S. is stretching into its 8th damned year of war in the Middle East and West Asia, American media and the American people are gleefully trashing celebrities, especially female celebrities.

Oh, did I mention that AOL “News” is steeping deeper and deeper into the muck of misogyny and sensationalist trash that is the mainstream media lately?

Yeah. Within the past month or so, I cannot remember seeing more invasive and sexist gossip about female celebrities in my life.
Every single miniscule detail of every woman’s reproductive and bodily functions is laid out in big, obnoxious headlines for all to see. Here’s a list of a set of AOL news headlines shown at the most visible part of AOL’s homepage for only one day:

What Happened To Katie’s Hands? She Tries to Hide Odd Discoloration, But Scientology Rumors Fly: It’s Ugly

‘Plan on Seeing Me Fat … Proud’: Actress Has Reason for Weight Gain

Tinseltown Tribe Has Spoken New Lady Love for ‘Survivor’ Host?

Howard Stern Sad by Friends’ Split

J.Lo Must Not Have Known Cameras Were Snapping (when you click on this headline, this is the image and “story” you get)

And that was just one box of headlines, ONE! But don’t worry folks, it gets better:

Underneath a headline about the prospects of a male olympian athlete, and one about how a female tennis player cried because she lost a play or game, there is “Danica Gets Into ‘Heated’ Exchange: Why Did Female Driver Snap at Her?”

Mary-Kate’s Odd Boots Cause Stir

I won’t make you read the poorly written excuses-for-articles that numerous idiots from the AP or AOL crank out. You don’t even have to read the articles (unless you want to sponateously combust) to understand this: AOL wants to remind you that women suck hairy ass. Why? They get “too emotional” and “catty” when playing sports. Hell, the female celebrities that are conventionally pretty and fitting somewhat into their roles (like Katie Holmes, and JLo, for example) are still getting trashed all the time, for, I dunno, doing normal things like eating, not wearing makeup, talking. FFS.

You’re damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. This is the fate of women in the patriarchy. Yes, even if you are white and middle/upper class. Even if you’re a celebrity. Because when you’re a woman, even your racial and class privilege, even your celebrity, is revokable. It seems to me that the only reason there are females who are made into celebrities is so that men, and, by extension, the media, can piss and shit all over these women after placing them up on gilded pedestals.

And you know what’s even more sad? Is that there are quite a few folks out there who think these female celebrities are “empowered.” Empowered because of what? Their money? Their expensive clothes? The predominantly male attention they are getting?…

Here’s what I got when I googled images of “female celebrities.”

Here’s what I got when I googled images of “male celebrities.”

Interesting, huh?

So, tell me, what do you think about female celebrities and their status in Western culture (I am thinking the female celebrity gossip and attacks are prevalent in Europe and the UK too)? Do you think they can be empowered?

Oh, and poor Howard fuckin Stern, he’s “sad.” Boo f’*n hoo. I hope he croaks soon.





I love love love Staceyann Chin

17 07 2008

Listen to her. You will see that her passionate and honest words have everything to do with my first post and discussion in the comments.

“…A revolution once pregnant with expectation flounders,
Apathetic and individualistic, no one knows where to vote
Or what to vote for anymore,
The faces that now represent us,
have now begun to look like the ones who used to burn crosses,
and beat bulldaggers
and fuck faggots up the ass with loaded guns…”

Thanks for the inspiration ekitty ;)





Never trust liberal white men

16 07 2008

 

/

Oh yeahh, totally seeing the "satire".... :/

 

So some idiot who thinks he’s the smartest and most edumacated person (re: white male) in the world says this.

Satire?  Really?  Where, exactly?  There is no frame of reference, no juxtaposed image of, say, racist sexist wife-beating McCain* to make this a satire.  Must everything that’s straight up offensive, racist, and misogynist be labeled “satire” by privileged white males who never suffer the effects or consequences of these horrid images and stereotypes?

What you’ve got here is basically a pin up poster for tons of racist and sexist bigots and conservatives here in this country.  I am no genious, but I am certainly not among “the basest” of American society.  Oh, I GET this poster:  it’s racist, sexist BS.

People like me, ya know, angry good-for-nothin’ sandnigger raghead camel jockeys, are the ones who suffer directly from the perpetuation of this racist bullshit.  With the prevalence of racist and Islamophobic stereotyping, abuse, and hate crimes in this country, how can a cover like this on The New Yorker be anything but offensive, downright irresponsible, and a slap in the face to African Americans, Muslims, and peoples of Middle Eastern descent?  White male liberals like the author of the above-mentioned article (Knowles) can bask in their self-righteous glory, unharmed by the effects of these racist images, all the while believing that they are incapable of racism and bigotry, and that only the “basest” (I guess Knowles is referring vaguely to working-class/formerly-uneducated white people :/ ) among Americans wouldn’t be “in on the joke.”

Screw you, and your arrogant white male writing, Knowles. 

Something else important:  anyone notice too the light brown highlights in Michelle Obama’s afro?  Allusion to Angela Davis, much?  For those of you not as familiar with African American/women’s herstory, Davis has been an outspoken activist and writer against sexism, racism, classism, and the prison establishment for years now.  She was, and still is, considered such a threat to governmental white male hegemony that she was thrown in prison years ago based on false charges of intent to murder the President.  Oh, and to add insult to injury, observe the portrait of Osama Bin Laden (or is that the Ayatollah?) above an American flag burning in the fireplace.  Looks like white Americans are scared of what might happen to the White House should Black and/or mixed race folk run it.  If Blackness or Browness is the downfall of American government and society, one must wonder what many (white) Americans think America stands for….

*McCain has made jokes about beating his wife and lots of other wretched stuff, so his being depicted as a wife-beating bigot is not a stereotype so much as very likely.

P.S.: This is my first blog post ever.  How do I create links?  I tried the whole < and href thing and it didn’t work.  If you have any solutions to this problem, let me know.  Thanks!